Recruitment Policy Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Recruitment Policy - Case Study Example The paper states that the human resource management’s recruitment policies must ensure high job applicant turnout. Hiring companies include in their recruitment policies that recruitment advertisements at graduate recruitment presentations or in notices placed at job centres must not include a â€Å"warts and all† policy. The absences of the Warts-and-all aspects during the recruitment process to delivery a realistic and message at the selection stage as a means of helping the companies attract and employ job candidates to establish the job applicants’ suitability for the jobs concerned. First, stating that the company will not hesitate to fire employees having lackluster job performances will create fear in the hearts of the faint-hearted job applicants. The absence of the warts-and-all statements will increase job applicant volume. The recruitment office must focus on the â€Å"suitor† approach over the â€Å"realistic or negative† in order to win the approval of the Job applicant. The company can show that current and prospective employees can have there are coffee or snack breaks in the morning and in the afternoon. Likewise, the company can offer a car plan to employees generating excellent or very satisfactory job performances. The company can offer rewards and promotions to employees constantly exceeding established monthly benchmarks. To increase the job applicant database, the negative or warts-and-all hiring policy must be included during the second phase of the recruitment process, the interview phase.

Analysis of Story Of The Three LIttle Bears by Eleanor Mure Essay

Analysis of Story Of The Three LIttle Bears by Eleanor Mure - Essay Example After reading the short story, I could feel no gratification at all, especially since the ending is quite unusual. Unlike in most children’s stories that have a happy ending or a lesson, the significant lesson to be learned from the story is not quite clear to me, and I think this would be the case for children who would read this too. It implies punishment for people who do not respect other people’s property. For me, this would not be effective. Rewards would be more appealing in teaching children. Perhaps one of the lessons that the author tries to teach here is that of moderation. Goldilocks finds herself choosing the middle path. She likes the porridge that is not too warm nor too cold; she chooses the chair that is not too hard nor too soft; and she prefers the bed that does not have too much space above her head or below her feet. Yet, if this lesson is indeed the intention of this story, then it is not clear as no obvious rewards are given for her actions. On the contrary, punishment is implied for Goldilocks at the end of the story. It troubles me that the words â€Å"she broke her neck† were used at the end to imply punishment for her rude and disrespectful behavior. But then again, whether or not she was indeed punished is left for the reader to guess, as there was no trace of her and the bears never saw her again. I find this quite troubling, since it makes me wonder what the point of the story really is. There is no clear reward or punishment for the actions that Goldilocks did, and thus, whatever the lesson this story is supposed to teach children is not reinforced. During the course of the story, I felt a sense of hope that it would end up great. Since the bears were polite and good-natured, I was hoping that they would forgive Goldilocks for what she did. Yet when it reached the end, Goldilocks simply ran away. The story leaves the reader hanging, and not pleasantly at that. Digging deeper than just reading the short story on the book, I